Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland .Chapter 12: Alice’s Evidence.
Alice jumps to the White Rabbit’s call towards the stand.
She forgets that she has grown larger and knocks on the jury stand, then scrambles to place every one of the jurors back. Alice claims to know “nothing whatever” concerning the tarts, that the King deems “very important.” The King is corrected by the White Rabbit, suggesting that he in fact means “unimportant.” The King agrees, muttering the words that is“important “unimportant” to himself.
The King interjects with Rule 42, which states, “All persons significantly more than a mile high to leave the court.” Everyone turns to Alice, who denies this woman is a mile high and accuses the King of fabricating the rule. The King replies that Rule 42 is the oldest rule when you look at the book, but Alice retorts that it ought to be the first rule if it is the oldest rule in the book. The King becomes quiet for a brief moment before calling for a verdict. The White Rabbit interrupts and declares that more evidence should be presented first. He presents a paper supposedly written by the Knave, though it is not written in the Knave’s handwriting. The Knave refutes the charge, explaining that there’s no signature in the document. The King reasons that the Knave will need to have meant mischief because he would not sign the note like an honest man would. The court seems pleased by this reasoning, additionally the Queen concludes that the paper proves the Knave’s guilt. Alice demands to read through the poem in the paper. The King provides an explanation and calls for a verdict while the poem appears to have no meaning. The Queen demands that the sentence come ahead of the verdict. Alice chaffs at this proposal and criticizes the Queen, who calls for Alice’s beheading. Alice is continuing to grow to her full size and bats away the credit cards while they fly upon her.
Alice suddenly wakes up and finds herself back on the sister’s lap at the riverbank. She tells her adventures to her sister who bids her go inside for tea. Alice traipses off, while her sister remains by the riverbank daydreaming. She envisions the characters from Alice’s adventures, but understands that when she opens her eyes the images will dissipate. She imagines that Alice will one grow older but retain her childlike spirit and recount her adventures to other children day.
The chapter title “Alice’s Evidence” refers both to your evidence that Alice gives through the trial, plus the evidence that she discovers that Wonderland is a dream that she will control by waking up. Alice realizes through the trial that it all “doesn’t matter a bit” what the jury records or if the jury is upside down or right side up. None associated with the details or orientations in Wonderland have any bearing on a coherent or meaningful outcome. Alice’s growth during the trial mirrors her awareness that is growing of proven fact that Wonderland is an illusion. She starts to grow as soon as the Mad Hatter bites into his teacup, and she reaches height that is full the heated exchange with the Queen when she points out that her antagonists are “nothing but a pack of cards!” Alice exposes Wonderland as an illusion along with her growth to full size comes with her realization that she has a measure of control of the illusion. Once she realizes that Wonderland is a dream, she wakes up and shatters the illusion.
Alice fully grasps the nature that is nonsensical of when the King interprets the Knave’s poem. Alice disputes the King’s attempts to attach meaning to the nonsense words of the poem. Her criticisms are ironic, since throughout her travels she has continually attempted to make sense regarding the various situations and stories she’s got encountered. Alice finally understands the futility of trying which will make meaning out of her adventures of Wonderland since every right element of it really is completely incomprehensible. This message is supposed not just for Alice but for the readers of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland as well. In the same way the court complies using the King’s harebrained readings associated with poem, Carroll sends a note to those that would try to assign specific meanings to the events. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland actively resists definitive interpretation, which makes up the diversity of the criticism written about the novella.
The scene that is final Alice’s sister establishes narrative symmetry and changes the tone of Alice’s journey from harrowing quest to childhood fantasy.
The reintroduction regarding the calm scene at the riverbank allows the story to close since it began, transforming Wonderland into custom writings us com an isolated episode of fancy. Alice’s sister ends the novella by changing the tone of Alice’s story, discounting the nightmarish qualities and favoring a nostalgia that is dreamy “the simple and loving heart of her childhood.” The interpretation that is sister’s Alice’s experience of trauma and trivializes the journey as little more than a “strange tale” that Alice may eventually recount to her very own children.